Skip to content

Languages: 简体中文 · English · 日本語 · 繁體中文


🏗️ System Architecture & Agent Registry

This document is the system-level architecture specification for the multi-agent editorial team. It defines registration information, interaction relationships, and information-flow rules for all Agents.


1. System Philosophy

Agents Are Stateless, Disposable Workers

In this framework, every Agent is treated as a stateless, disposable worker:

  • No Memory: An Agent retains no context from previous invocations. Every start is a blank slate.
  • No Autonomy: Agents do not decide when they work or what they do. All scheduling is handled by the Orchestrator.
  • Replaceable: Any Agent instance can be replaced by a new instance of the same type — as long as the inputs (File Pointers) are the same, the outputs should be consistent.

All State Is Stored in Shared Files on Disk

"Memory passing" between Agents is implemented entirely through the file system:

Agent A 产出 → 写入文件 → 主编排注入文件路径给 Agent B → Agent B 读取 → 获得"记忆"

This is consistent with modern microservice architecture principles:

  • Services (Agents) are themselves stateless; state is stored externally (the file system)
  • Services communicate through messages (File Pointers), not direct calls
  • The Orchestrator is responsible for service discovery and scheduling

The Orchestrator Injects Context via File Pointers

File Pointers are the core mechanism by which the Orchestrator controls Agent behavior:

主编排调用 Agent 时的 Prompt 结构:

  "你是 {{角色名称}}。请执行以下任务:{{任务描述}}。

   📂 必读文件:
   - {{文件路径1}}  ← 用途说明
   - {{文件路径2}}  ← 用途说明

   📝 输出要求:
   - 将结果写入 {{输出文件路径}}
   - 格式要求:{{格式说明}}"

The value of File Pointers:

  • Precise information scoping: Agents only see the information they need, avoiding context-window waste
  • Clear read/write boundaries: Every Agent knows exactly what it can read and what it should write
  • Traceability: The complete context for any Agent invocation can be reconstructed from the File Pointers manifest

2. Agent Registry

Core Creation Group

CodeNameRole MetaphorAgent TypeResponsibilitiesReference
#0OrchestratorDirector / Producergeneral-purposeSchedules the full pipeline, manages progress and dependencies, injects context via File Pointers→ 01-orchestrator.md
#1ArchitectTechnical Directorgeneral-purposeAnalyzes source-code structure, designs chapter outlines and knowledge maps, plans inter-chapter dependencies→ 02-architect.md
#2Reader AdvocateProduct Managergeneral-purposeReviews the outline from the target reader's perspective, ensuring chapter order matches the learning curve→ 03-reader-advocate.md
#3ResearcherSource Code ArchaeologistexploreDeep-dives into source modules for the specified chapter, producing structured research reports→ 04-researcher.md
#4WriterBestselling Authorgeneral-purposeWrites chapter content based on research reports and the style guide→ 05-writer.md

Review Group

CodeNameRole MetaphorAgent TypeResponsibilitiesReference
R1Code ReviewerCode Verification ExpertexploreVerifies the accuracy of every code reference in a chapter: file paths, function signatures, behavioral descriptions→ 06-code-reviewer.md
R2Consistency ReviewerMemory KeeperexploreChecks cross-chapter terminology consistency, data coherence, and cross-reference completeness→ 07-consistency-reviewer.md
R3Content ReviewerSenior Editorgeneral-purposeReviews readability, narrative structure, and sensitive content; ensures conformance to the style guide→ 08-content-reviewer.md

Reader Panel

CodeNameRole MetaphorAgent TypeResponsibilitiesReference
RSStudent ReaderCS Junior Undergraduategeneral-purposeSimulates a beginner's perspective: flags unclear terms, missing background knowledge, and logical leaps→ 09-reader-panel.md
REEngineer Reader8-Year Full-Stack Engineergeneral-purposeSimulates a professional developer's perspective: evaluates technical depth, practicality, and whether new insights are gained→ 09-reader-panel.md
RHHobbyist ReaderNon-Technical Tech Enthusiastgeneral-purposeSimulates a non-technical reader's perspective: checks whether analogies are vivid and concepts are explained accessibly→ 09-reader-panel.md

Publishing Group

CodeNameRole MetaphorAgent TypeResponsibilitiesReference
#11BookbinderTypesetter / Designergeneral-purposeMarkdown→HTML conversion, Mermaid diagram rendering, ASCII→SVG rendering, zero-dependency build script→ 10-bookbinder.md
#12Quality InspectorFactory QA Inspectorgeneral-purpose7 programmatic checks on EPUB output (ZIP structure / XML validity / SVG color / CSS compliance / title consistency / cover / navigation); routes fix tickets→ 11-quality-inspector.md

3. Interaction Diagram

                          ┌──────────────┐
                          │   👤 用户     │
                          │  审核 / 决策  │
                          └──────┬───────┘
                                 │ 指令/审核
                          ┌──────▼───────┐
                          │ 🎯 主编排 #0  │ ← 贯穿 Phase 1→5
                          │ Orchestrator │   SQL进度 + File Pointers
                          └──────┬───────┘
                                 │ 调度各Agent
  ═══════════════════════════════▼═══════════════════════════════
  ║         📂 共享文件系统(Agent间唯一通信通道)               ║
  ║  chapter-summaries · glossary · metaphor-registry           ║
  ║  source-map · cross-references · style-guide                ║
  ║  checkpoint · audit-log                                     ║
  ═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════

  ┌──────────────────────────────▼──────────────────────────────┐
  │                                                             │
  │  Phase 1  大纲定稿                                          │
  │  ┌──────────┐ ┌───────────┐                                 │
  │  │ 🏗️ #1    │ │ 👤 #2     │ ──→ 📖 R3 大纲审核             │
  │  │ 架构师   │ │ 读者代言人│                                 │
  │  └──────────┘ └───────────┘                                 │
  │       ↓                                                     │
  │  Phase 2  共享资源构建(Orchestrator 直接生成)              │
  │       ↓                                                     │
  │  Phase 3  逐章写作 ×{{章节数}}章                             │
  │    Step 1   🔬 #3 研究员 ─────── 源码调研                   │
  │       ↓                                                     │
  │    Step 2   ✍️ #4 作家 ───────── 章节撰写                   │
  │       ↓                                                     │
  │    Step 3   ┌──────┬──────┬──────┐  三员并行审查             │
  │             │🔬 R1 │🔗 R2 │📖 R3 │                         │
  │             │源码   │一致  │内容   │                         │
  │             └──────┴──────┴──────┘                          │
  │       ↓                                                     │
  │    Step 4   ┌──────┬──────┬──────┐  三人并行评审             │
  │             │🎓 RS │💻 RE │🌐 RH │                         │
  │             │大学生│工程师│爱好者│                         │
  │             └──────┴──────┴──────┘                          │
  │       ↓                                                     │
  │  Phase 4  统稿与最终审计(Orchestrator + 审查组复审)        │
  │       ↓                                                     │
  │  Phase 5  HTML Typesetting & Publishing                     │
  │  ┌─────────────┐                                            │
  │  │ 📚 #11      │  Markdown→HTML · ASCII→SVG                │
  │  │ Bookbinder  │  Zero-dependency build script              │
  │  └──────┬──────┘                                            │
  │         │ EPUB output                                       │
  │  ┌──────▼──────┐                                            │
  │  │ 🔍 #12      │  7 programmatic QA checks                 │
  │  │ Quality     │  ZIP/XML/SVG color/CSS/titles/cover/nav    │
  │  │ Inspector   │  Routes fix tickets → #11 or #4            │
  │  └─────────────┘                                            │
  └─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
  Legend: #N = Agent number  R1/R2/R3 = Reviewers  RS/RE/RH = Reader panel

Architecture Interpretation

Hub-Spoke Pattern: The Orchestrator (#0) is the sole Hub; all other Agents are Spokes. This means:

  1. Acyclic dependencies: Information flow is unidirectional (Orchestrator → Agent → file → Orchestrator); no circular calls exist between Agents
  2. Fault isolation: Failure of any Spoke Agent affects only the current task and does not cascade to other Agents
  3. Observability: All scheduling decisions reside in the Orchestrator, making logging and debugging straightforward

Parallelization points:

  • Phase 3 Step 3: Reviewers R1, R2, and R3 run in parallel (orthogonal review dimensions)
  • Phase 3 Step 4: Readers RS, RE, and RH run in parallel (independent review perspectives)
  • Phase 3 inter-chapter: Step 1 (research) for one chapter can run in parallel with Step 2 (writing) for a chapter whose research is already complete

4. Information Flow Rules

Rule 1: Unidirectional Communication — All Instructions Originate from the Orchestrator

✅ 主编排 → Agent      (通过 File Pointers 注入任务)
✅ Agent → 文件系统     (写入产出物)
✅ 主编排 ← 文件系统    (读取产出物,决定下一步)
❌ Agent → Agent        (禁止直接通信)
❌ Agent → 主编排       (Agent 不主动发起请求)

Agents are unaware of one another's existence. An Agent only sees the files provided by the Orchestrator and writes results after completing its task.

Rule 2: File Pointers Follow the Principle of Least Privilege

Each Agent receives only the minimum number of file references needed to complete the current task:

AgentTypical Required Input FilesTypical Output Files
#3 Researcheroutline.md (current chapter's section), source-map.md, glossary.mdresearch/chXX-research.md
#4 Writerresearch/chXX-research.md, style-guide.md, chapter-summaries.md, metaphor-registry.mdchapters/chXX.md
R1 Code Reviewerchapters/chXX.md, source files (as needed)reviews/chXX-code-review.md
R2 Consistency Reviewerchapters/chXX.md, glossary.md, chapter-summaries.md, cross-references.mdreviews/chXX-consistency-review.md
R3 Content Reviewerchapters/chXX.md, style-guide.mdreviews/chXX-content-review.md

💡 The Writer does not receive the full body text of other chapters (to avoid wasting context-window capacity); it only receives the summaries in chapter-summaries.md.

Rule 3: Shared Files Are the Only Information Bridge Between Agents

The following shared files form the "long-term memory" between Agents:

Shared FileWriterReader(s)Purpose
source-map.md#0 Orchestrator#1, #3, R1Source-code directory structure and module descriptions
outline.md#1 ArchitectAll AgentsChapter outline and knowledge dependency graph
glossary.md#0 (initial) → #4 (appended)All AgentsUnified book-wide glossary
metaphor-registry.md#4 Writer (appended)#4, R2Registry of used metaphors, preventing cross-chapter duplication
style-guide.md#0 Orchestrator#4, R3Writing style specification
chapter-summaries.md#0 (updated after each chapter)#4, R2Summaries of completed chapters
cross-references.md#4 (appended) → R2 (verified)#4, R2, #0Cross-chapter reference registry

Rule 4: State Inference — File Existence Equals Progress

The Orchestrator infers the progress status of each chapter by inspecting the file system:

文件不存在                        → 未开始
research/chXX-research.md 存在   → Step 1 完成(研究完成)
chapters/chXX.md 存在            → Step 2 完成(初稿完成)
reviews/chXX-*-review.md 存在    → Step 3 完成(审查完成)
feedback/chXX-*-feedback.md 存在 → Step 4 完成(评审完成)
chapters/chXX-final.md 存在      → 该章定稿

This gives the pipeline checkpoint recovery capability: after an interruption and restart, the Orchestrator scans the file system to restore progress without any additional state storage.


Framework Documents

DocumentPathDescription
Five-Phase Workflow Detailsframework/workflow.mdDetailed steps, entry conditions, and exit conditions for each phase
File Pointers Mechanismframework/file-pointers.mdDesign principles and usage specifications for File Pointers
Review & Panel Protocolframework/review-architecture.mdScoring criteria and feedback formats for reviewers and reader panel
Parallel Execution Strategyframework/parallel-strategy.mdScheduling strategies for multi-chapter and multi-agent parallelism
Checkpoint Recovery Mechanismframework/recovery.mdMethod for recovering state after pipeline interruption

Agent Reference Documentation

AgentReference Path
#0 Orchestratoragents/01-orchestrator.md
#1 Architectagents/02-architect.md
#2 Reader Advocateagents/03-reader-advocate.md
#3 Researcheragents/04-researcher.md
#4 Writeragents/05-writer.md
R1 Code Revieweragents/06-code-reviewer.md
R2 Consistency Revieweragents/07-consistency-reviewer.md
R3 Content Revieweragents/08-content-reviewer.md
RS Student Readeragents/09-reader-panel.md
RE Engineer Readeragents/09-reader-panel.md
RH Hobbyist Readeragents/09-reader-panel.md
#11 Bookbinderagents/10-bookbinder.md
#12 Quality Inspectoragents/11-quality-inspector.md

Template Files

TemplatePathAction when starting a new project
Source Maptemplates/source-map.mdFill in the directory structure and core modules of the target source code
Outline Templatetemplates/outline.mdFill in the initial chapter plan (can be assisted by Architect #1)
Style Guidetemplates/style-guide.mdFill in writing style preferences and code display conventions
Glossarytemplates/glossary.mdFill in definitions and translations for known terms
Metaphor Registrytemplates/metaphor-registry.mdLeave blank; filled in progressively during the writing process

Built with Meridian